Common IT Infrastructure Pitfalls in Healthcare Construction (And How to Prevent Them)

In today's healthcare landscape, technology is no longer a supporting player; it's a critical foundation. Yet, too often, IT infrastructure is not adequately planned or accounted for in hospital construction projects. From misaligned timelines to overlooked cabling needs, these mistakes can lead to costly delays, reconstruction, and operational inefficiencies. At Equinox HIT, we've seen firsthand how early and strategic IT planning can significantly improve efficiency and reduce costs on a new build. Let's explore five common IT infrastructure pitfalls in healthcare construction and how to avoid them.

1. Delaying IT Involvement Until Late in the Project

The Mistake: One of the most costly errors in healthcare construction is treating IT infrastructure as a final installation step rather than a foundational design element. Too often, IT teams are brought in late into the design process after floor layouts are set, and structural elements are already in place. This late-stage involvement forces IT professionals to work around existing constraints rather than designing optimal solutions from the ground up.

The Impact: When IT infrastructure becomes an afterthought, the consequences ripple throughout the entire project. Retrofitting technology systems into completed structures often requires expensive modifications to walls, ceilings, and mechanical systems. Critical pathways for fiber optic cables, power redundancy, and equipment cooling may be compromised or entirely absent. The result is a domino effect of increased costs, extended timelines, and suboptimal performance that can plague the facility for decades.

Additionally, missed opportunities for integration become apparent only after it's too late to address them cost-effectively. Modern healthcare facilities require seamless connectivity between building systems, medical devices, and clinical workflows; integration that can be prohibitively expensive to achieve when IT is bolted on rather than built in.

The Solution: Successful healthcare construction projects engage IT stakeholders during the initial planning and design phases, treating technology infrastructure as equal in importance to plumbing and electrical systems. This early involvement allows IT professionals to collaborate with architects, engineers, and user groups to design optimal pathways for cabling, strategically locate equipment rooms, and ensure adequate power and cooling capacity.

Establish a multidisciplinary design team that includes IT representatives from day one. Create detailed IT requirements documents that outline current and projected technology needs, including bandwidth requirements, device connectivity, and specialized equipment specifications. This upfront investment in planning prevents costly retrofits and ensures the infrastructure can support both current operations and future growth.

2. Underestimating Cabling and Network Requirements

The Mistake: Healthcare facilities often fall victim to inadequate investment in structured cabling systems, with decision-makers viewing network infrastructure as a commodity rather than a strategic asset. This shortsighted approach typically manifests in inadequate cable pathways, insufficient cable density, and rigid network architectures that can't adapt to changing needs.

Many projects also fail to account for the unique demands of healthcare environments, where medical devices, patient monitoring systems, clinical workstations, and smart devices all compete for network resources. The assumption that "basic networking will suffice" severely underestimates the bandwidth and reliability requirements of modern healthcare technology.

The Impact: Inadequate cabling infrastructure creates bottlenecks that can affect patient care quality and operational efficiency. Insufficient network capacity leads to frustrated clinical staff who depend on real-time access to patient data and medical applications. As healthcare organizations adopt more connected devices and cloud-based solutions, these limitations become increasingly problematic.

Poor cabling design also limits scalability and increases long-term operational costs. When cable pathways are insufficient or poorly planned, adding new connections requires expensive remediation work. This lack of flexibility forces healthcare organizations to make technology decisions based on infrastructure limitations rather than clinical needs.

The Solution: Design network infrastructure with growth and flexibility in mind, planning for high-density cabling and scalable network architecture that can accommodate future expansion. Design for and implement robust wireless (802.11) and cellular DAS networks to supplement physical infrastructure. This approach provides the flexibility to support new medical devices, expanded clinical systems, and emerging technologies without major infrastructure overhauls.

3. Ignoring Clinical Workflow in IT Design

The Mistake: A common pitfall in healthcare IT infrastructure planning is designing systems in isolation from actual clinical workflows. IT teams may focus on technical specifications and industry standards while failing to consider how technology will be used in real-world clinical scenarios. This disconnect results in infrastructure that may be technically sound but practically inefficient for healthcare delivery.

This mistake often occurs when IT design decisions are made without input from clinical staff, nurses, physicians, and other end users who understand the nuances of patient care workflows. The result is technology placement, IT devices and hardware, and system configurations that don't align with how healthcare professionals actually work.

The Impact: When IT infrastructure doesn't support clinical workflows, the consequences directly affect patient care quality and staff efficiency. Poorly positioned IT devices and hardware force clinicians to work around technology rather than with it. Inadequate wireless coverage in critical areas can interrupt time-sensitive communications and delay patient care decisions.

Clinical staff may develop workarounds that bypass security protocols or create inefficiencies that reduce the time available for patient care. These adaptations can also introduce safety risks and compliance concerns that weren't anticipated during the design phase.

The Solution: Collaborate closely with clinical teams throughout the design process to understand real-world workflows and technology usage patterns. Conduct detailed workflow analysis that maps how different clinical roles move through the facility and interact with technology systems. This analysis should identify critical decision points, high-traffic areas, and workflow bottlenecks that IT infrastructure can help address.

Create mock-up environments where clinical staff can test proposed technology configurations and provide feedback before final implementation. This iterative approach ensures that the final infrastructure design truly supports efficient clinical operations rather than impeding them.

Develop technology placement strategies that align with clinical workflows, positioning network access points, workstations, and mobile device charging stations where they'll be most useful for patient care activities.

4. Overlooking Compliance and Information Security Early On

The Mistake: Information security and regulatory compliance are often treated as final checkboxes rather than foundational design principles in healthcare construction projects. This approach leads to IT infrastructure that may function adequately but fails to meet the stringent information security requirements of healthcare environments or comply with regulations like HIPAA, HITECH, and other healthcare-specific standards.

Many projects attempt to address information security and compliance concerns after the basic infrastructure is complete, resulting in costly retrofits and potentially compromised security architectures. This reactive approach to cybersecurity creates vulnerabilities that may not be apparent until systems are operational and patient data is at risk.

The Impact: Post-construction information security implementations are typically more expensive and less effective than security designed into the infrastructure from the beginning. Healthcare organizations may face regulatory violations, financial penalties, and reputational damage if their IT infrastructure fails to adequately protect patient information.

Inadequate information security infrastructure also creates operational challenges, as healthcare staff may find themselves working within systems that prioritize compliance over efficiency. This can lead to workarounds that actually increase security risks rather than mitigating them.

The Solution: Integrate cybersecurity and compliance requirements into the design and build phases from project inception. Develop a comprehensive information security architecture that addresses physical security, network segmentation, access controls, and data protection at the infrastructure level.

Implement network designs that support information security best practices, including micro-segmentation (isolating network segments to reduce attack surfaces), zero-trust architectures (where no user or device is automatically trusted), and robust monitoring capabilities. Plan for adequate space and power to support security appliances, monitoring systems, and backup infrastructure.

Engage cybersecurity professionals and compliance experts during the design phase to ensure that infrastructure decisions support rather than hinder security objectives. This proactive approach creates a foundation that can adapt to evolving security requirements and regulatory changes.

5. Failing to Plan for Technology Refresh Cycles

The Mistake: Many healthcare construction projects design IT infrastructure based solely on current technology requirements, failing to account for the rapid pace of technological change in healthcare. This shortsighted approach creates infrastructure that may be adequate at opening but quickly becomes obsolete as new medical devices, software applications, and connectivity standards emerge.

The mistake often stems from budget pressures that prioritize immediate cost savings over long-term flexibility and scalability. Decision-makers may view building future-ready infrastructure as unnecessary expense rather than strategic investment, leading to systems that require expensive upgrades within just a few years of completion.

The Impact: Infrastructure built only for today's technology quickly becomes a limiting factor for

healthcare organizations trying to adopt new medical technologies, improve patient care, and maintain competitive advantages. Rigid systems force expensive retrofits or workarounds that increase operational costs and complexity.

Healthcare organizations may find themselves unable to adopt beneficial new technologies because their infrastructure can't support them. This technological stagnation can affect patient care quality, operational efficiency, and the organization's ability to attract and retain clinical talent who expect to work with modern tools and systems.

The Solution: Build infrastructure with modularity and lifecycle planning in mind, designing systems that can evolve with changing technology requirements. Implement flexible architectures that can accommodate new devices, applications, and connectivity standards without major reconstruction.

Plan infrastructure capacity that significantly exceeds current requirements, providing headroom for growth and technology advancement. Design modular equipment rooms and cable pathways that can be easily expanded or reconfigured as needs change.

Develop long-term technology roadmaps that align infrastructure capabilities with anticipated healthcare technology trends. This strategic approach ensures that the physical infrastructure can support organizational goals and technology adoption plans for decades rather than just the first few years of operation.

The Foundation for Future Success

Successful healthcare construction requires treating IT infrastructure as a foundational element of the design process rather than an afterthought. By avoiding these common pitfalls—engaging IT early, investing in robust cabling infrastructure systems, aligning with clinical workflows, prioritizing information security and compliance, and planning for future technology needs—healthcare organizations can create facilities that truly support their mission of providing exceptional patient care.

The key is recognizing that IT infrastructure decisions made during construction will impact operations for decades to come. Strategic planning and upfront investment in quality infrastructure create the foundation for efficient operations, enhanced patient care, and long-term organizational success.

At Equinox HIT, we've learned that the most successful healthcare construction projects are those that view technology infrastructure as an enabler of clinical excellence rather than simply a necessary utility. By partnering with experienced healthcare IT professionals from project inception through completion, healthcare organizations can avoid these common pitfalls and create facilities positioned for success in our increasingly digital healthcare landscape.

Equinox HIT is Your HIT Construction Partner.

Ready to build the future of healthcare together? Contact us to schedule a consultation.

This article was developed by the Equinox HIT Team with editorial assistance from AI tools and re-reviewed by the Equinox HIT Team for accuracy and alignment with our standards.

References

1. Belden. “A Look at Upcoming BICSI 004 Healthcare Standard Revisions.” Belden Blog, 2024. Link

2. CMS. “HIPAA Basics for Providers: Privacy, Security, & Breach Notification Rules.” Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2024. Link

3. Harvard Business Review. “How Digital Transformation Can Improve Hospitals’ Operational Decisions.” HBR, 2022. Link

4. HIMSS. “Infrastructure Adoption Model (INFRAM).” HIMSS, 2024. Link

5. IAEI Magazine. “Overview of Article 517: Health Care Facilities.” IAEI, 2020. Link

6. TIA Fiber Optics Tech Consortium. “ANSI/TIA-1179-B: Healthcare Facility Telecommunications Infrastructure Standard.” TIA, 2023. Link

7. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). “Information Technology: Agencies Need to Plan for Modernizing Critical Decades-Old Legacy Systems.” GAO, 2025. Link